Welcome Guest: Login | It is currently Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:25 am

Board index Other Stuff Rules The 2008 Sabre Class Rules

Moderator: Sabre

The 2008 Sabre Class Rules

Postby CDance on Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:26 pm

The new Sabre class that came into effect in January have finally been posted on the website. Unfortunately the old rules were deleted and no change log was published. For these interested in "what's new", I've put together a document highlighting the delta. You can download this here:

http://dance.papercutsoftware.com/saili ... -delta.pdf

Does anything see anything significant? The extra 2mm on the headboard is interesting. There must be a story behind this one? The removal of "port side" in is also "convenient" as I know a number of boats, including my own, have the number embossed on the starboard side.


Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:22 am
Location: Australia

Postby andrewb on Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:48 pm

Can anyone please clarify the position regarding attachment of the final mainsheet block. In the new rules 1.11.3(n) states:

Alternative types of control systems (provided maximum purchase limits are not exceeded and
other requirements are met, e.g. mainsheet shall lead through a block on the keel stiffening timber
to the hand).

Where does the last statement come from? The inference is that it is just an example of another 'requirement' that may need to be met. I can't see any specific reference to this requirement elsewhere in the rules. Rule 5.2 states:

then via a floor-attached block to the skipper

With many boats now having an extension tube between the floor & the final mainsheet block such an arrangement would seem to be clearly outwith these two statements - i.e. attached to the keel stiffening timber or floor. I have also seen on the forum (http://www.sabre.org.au/forum/viewtopic ... t=diagonal) that diagonal bracing of the tube to the thwart is also allowed. These seem significant performance advantages over the block attached directly to the keel stiffening. As such their legality should be stated clearly.
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:04 pm


Postby Dave Bacon on Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:02 pm

There appears some comfusion regarding the legality of some mainsheet block arrangements - the English language is obviously not well understood.
This is the way it works. After enough people have adopted something illegal, it becomes defined as "common practice" and is incorporated in the rules.
It probably started years ago when someone played around with the hull shape (ignored). More recently we had the extra vang purchases - eventually legalised.
Now we have lots of boats with the illegal extension on the mainsheet block, i.e block and mounting plate not fixed directly to keel, and several with the diagonal bracing to the thwart.
Presumably these will become legalised retrospectivly, but a lot of people should have been disqualified in the past. ( Rule 1.10. If not listed as permissible it's prohibited)
Perhaps the committee should give some guidance as to how many people need to adopt a "common practice" before it automatically becomes legal.
Dave Bacon
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:14 pm
Location: Australia

Return to Rules

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests